Saturday, May 26, 2012

Final Review

The Final review gave feedback to three key points of project:
   
    1.  How is tempo/rhythm portrayed inside the library?  Are there differences between the patterns of program both aesthetically and use?
    2.  How does sound manipulate the spaces within the library?  Can you incorporate tempo changes to the layout of programmatic spaces using the differences of sound?
    3.  The facade of the Library was very simple.  Very different from the way you expressed 'rhythm' on the facade at the mid-term.  You should try and find a middle ground between your expressions.

In moving forward, I am still sketching interior tempo concepts of program layout and rhythmic changes in material, light, visual connection and sound.  I understand that we are not to redesign our projects but I do believe change is going to come in a progressive state of evolvement.  I am pleased with the concept of my program of a library that catalogues the city's musicians to make them available for browsing/collaboration.  Although there is an abundance of musicians n the city, I find that t is still difficult to locate people to jam with, and this is unfortunate.  My musicians resource library will provide the community and appropriate attitude to allow musicians to come out of the wood work and express their creativity on a platform to the city.


No comments:

Post a Comment